Game Development: Game Studios Have a Variety of Criteria to Satisfy Before Releasing a Game

Releasing a game is never as simple as finishing development and hitting publish. Behind every commercial release, whether it’s a AAA title or an indie slot game, lies a dense checklist of requirements that studios must work through before a single player can log in.

These range from technical performance benchmarks to age rating classifications, platform certification processes, and, perhaps most critically, legal compliance. Studios that underestimate this phase often face delayed launches, rejected submissions, or, in the worst cases, regulatory fines and forced shutdowns.

Jurisdiction, Licensing, and the Legal Framework

The most important aspect to address in game development is legal matters. This is not simply about avoiding trouble; it is a fundamental part of how a game reaches its audience at all.

Legal compliance dictates where a game can be sold, how it must be marketed, what features are permitted, and whether the studio itself is authorized to operate in a given market. Ignoring this layer does not just slow a release down; it can make it impossible entirely. Regulatory bodies in different regions hold real authority over what enters their market, and studios operating without proper licensing risk having their products removed, their payment processors cut off, and their companies blacklisted.

A clear example of how critical this is comes from the Dutch online casino industry. Online casino games (including slots, table games, live dealer formats, and video poker) are enormously popular in the Netherlands. However, as can be seen here, it is important that players understand the difference between local and internationally licensed sites before accessing them, because the offers available on those platforms are directly determined by jurisdiction. A site licensed under the Dutch KSA (Kansspelautoriteit) operates under a completely different ruleset than one based offshore. The games it can offer, the bonuses it can advertise, and the responsible gambling tools it must provide are all shaped by that legal framework.

For game developers supplying content to these platforms, this has direct consequences. A studio building slot games for the Dutch market cannot simply port over a product built for the UK or Malta. Each jurisdiction specifies technical requirements: RTP thresholds, volatility disclosures, session time limits, and self-exclusion integrations, such as CRUKS in the Netherlands.

Platform Certification: Getting Past the Gatekeepers

Beyond legal licensing, every major distribution platform has its own certification process that games must pass independently. Console manufacturers like Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo each maintain technical requirement checklists (often hundreds of items long) that developers must verify before a submission is accepted. These cover everything from crash reporting and save file handling to network behavior and accessibility features. A single failed requirement can result in a full resubmission, costing weeks of development time.

Mobile platforms operate similarly. Apple’s App Store review process is notoriously strict, particularly around games that include any form of in-app purchasing, randomized rewards, or real-money mechanics.

Google Play has its own equivalent policies. Studios building casino-adjacent or gambling-themed games face additional scrutiny, as both platforms have specific rules about simulated gambling content and what age ratings apply. Getting certification wrong at this stage means the game never reaches its intended audience, regardless of how polished the product is.

Third-party testing labs also play a role here, particularly in the iGaming space. Before a casino game can go live on a licensed platform, it typically needs to be verified by an independent testing house such as eCOGRA, GLI, or BMM Testlabs. These organizations audit the game’s random number generator, verify that payout percentages match stated values, and confirm that all game mechanics function as described.

Age Ratings, Content Classification, and Regional Restrictions

Every game released commercially needs an age rating, and obtaining one is not automatic. In most major markets, this requires submitting the game to a classification board: PEGI in Europe, ESRB in North America, CERO in Japan, and others elsewhere.

Studios must provide detailed disclosures about violence, language, sexual content, drug references, and gambling elements. The resulting rating affects where the game can be sold, how it must be packaged and marketed, and, in some regions, which age-verification systems the platform must enforce at the point of sale.

Regional content restrictions add another layer. The process involves content review, localization requirements, and partnership obligations with domestic publishers. Similar approval frameworks exist in other markets. A game cleared for release in Europe may need significant modifications or may be blocked entirely before it can enter certain other territories.

Technical Standards, Accessibility, and Post-Launch Obligations

Technical requirements extend well past platform certification. Many markets now expect studios to meet minimum accessibility standards: closed captions, colorblind modes, remappable controls, and scalable UI elements.

The UK and other regions have increasingly pushed for accessibility as a baseline expectation rather than an optional extra. Studios that build these features in from the start avoid costly retrofitting later.

Data protection law adds further obligations. Games that collect player data, including virtually every online title, must comply with the GDPR in Europe and equivalent frameworks elsewhere. Privacy policies must be accurate, consent mechanisms must function properly, and data storage practices must comply with regional requirements. A studio that handles this carelessly can face penalties entirely unrelated to the game's content or quality.

🔙 Back to Articles list.